Oriental or Western-Oriented?
The Identity of the Syro-Malabar Church between
Tradition and Transformation
It is
often said that the Syro-Malabar Catholic Church is Oriental in worship and
Indian in culture. This statement captures an essential truth about the
historical and spiritual identity of the Church. The Syro-Malabar Church
belongs to the East Syriac liturgical tradition, which originated in the
regions of Syria, Iraq, and Persia. The liturgy celebrated by the Church today
has its roots in the worship life of the early Christian communities of
Mesopotamia, where Christianity flourished very early and developed its own
distinctive theological and liturgical expressions.
Historically,
the language of worship in the Syro-Malabar Church has been East Syriac,
a dialect of Aramaic—the language spoken by Jesus himself. The bishops who came
to Kerala in the early centuries of Christianity were from Persia and later
from Mesopotamia, and they brought with them the ecclesial traditions of the
Church of the East. Many of the early saints and Church Fathers who shaped this
tradition were East Syrians, with theological centers such as Edessa
playing a crucial role in forming Christian thought and worship. As a result,
the Syro-Malabar liturgy was unmistakably Oriental in character, marked by
symbolic richness, poetic prayer, and a deep sense of mystery.
One of
the most striking examples of this Oriental heritage is the use of the Eucharistic
Prayer of Addai and Mari, one of the most ancient anaphoras still in use in
the Church today. This prayer reflects the early Christian understanding of the
Eucharist, emphasizing salvation history, thanksgiving, and the action of the
Holy Spirit. Thus, the liturgy of the
Syro-Malabar Church stands as a living witness to the antiquity and
authenticity of Eastern Christian worship.
However,
this Oriental liturgical identity underwent significant changes during the last
four centuries, especially after the Synod of Diamper (1599). Convened
under the influence of Portuguese colonial and ecclesiastical authorities, the
Synod introduced numerous Western-oriented changes into the liturgy, theology,
devotional practices, and ecclesial discipline of the Syro-Malabar Church.
Latin theological categories, Roman rubrics, Western devotional practices, and
even certain ecclesiological assumptions gradually became part of the lived
faith of the community. Over time, these Western elements were not merely
imposed externally but were absorbed into the religious consciousness of the
faithful and became part of their spiritual heritage.
In recent
decades, there has been a strong movement within the Syro-Malabar Church to
rediscover and restore the pre-Diamper Oriental liturgy. This effort is
inspired by the Second Vatican Council’s call for Eastern Catholic Churches to
return to their authentic traditions and preserve their distinct identity
within the universal Church. While this movement is theologically justified and
historically necessary, it also raises serious pastoral and cultural questions.
The
tradition of the last 400 years cannot be dismissed lightly. Four centuries is
not a short span of time but a vast historical period—indeed, it is double the
history of the United States of America. A sudden and radical return to
liturgical forms that were unfamiliar to generations of the faithful,
especially when such changes were introduced abruptly in the 1960s and
afterward, cannot easily erase what has been lived, loved, and practiced for
centuries. As T.S. Eliot insightfully observed, tradition is not the
“pastness of the past” but the “presentness of the past.” Tradition lives
insofar as it continues to shape the present, not when it is artificially
resurrected or rigidly imposed.
A sudden
wiping away of long-standing devotions, popular religious practices, and
familiar forms of worship can be deeply harmful to the devotional life of
ordinary believers. Faith is not sustained by historical purity alone but by
continuity, affective memory, and lived experience. When people feel that what
nourished their spiritual life for generations is being rejected or labeled
inferior, it can lead to confusion, resistance, and even alienation from the
Church. Authentic renewal must therefore be pastoral, gradual, and respectful
of the faith experience of the people.
It must
also be remembered that even the Oriental liturgy itself did not descend fully
formed from apostolic times. It took centuries to develop. Patriarchs,
theologians, and liturgists across generations added prayers, hymns, and ritual
elements to the ancient texts, responding to the spiritual needs of their
communities. In this sense, Oriental tradition itself is a living tradition,
not a museum artifact frozen in time. To absolutize one historical form of the
liturgy while rejecting later developments is to misunderstand the organic
nature of tradition.
The
reflections of Thomas Merton in his book New Seeds of Contemplation
are particularly relevant in this context. He writes:
“The
biggest paradox about the Church is that she is at the same time essentially
traditional and essentially revolutionary. But that is not as much of a paradox
as it seems, because Christian tradition, unlike all others, is a living and
perpetual revolution… The living of Catholicism is like the breath of a
physical body. It renews life by repelling stagnation; it is a constant, quiet,
peaceful revolution against death.
Pope
Benedict XVI in his book,”I believe in One God”, speaks of the living and
contemporary nature of Tradition:” Tradition is the communion of the faithful
around their legitimate Pastors down through the centuries.It is the permanent
actualization of the active presence of the Lord.”
Pope
Francis in his book,”Hope” explains the intertwining between contemporaneity and tradition in the Liturgy:
“The
liturgy can’t be a rite that is an end in itself,detached from pastoral
considerations.the liturgy is an encounter and it is a new start towards
others.Christians are not those who go backward.The flow of history and grace
moves like the sap of a tree that bears
fruit.Tradition means moving forward….aspiring to unity does not mean
uniformity.”
Merton’s
insight, thus,t reminds us that true tradition is dynamic rather than static.
It preserves life by adapting, renewing, and responding to changing contexts,
while remaining rooted in the Gospel. Any attempt to reform the liturgy or
reclaim Oriental identity must therefore embody this balance between fidelity
and creativity, continuity and renewal.
When we
turn to the culture and education of the Syro-Malabar Catholics, the
positive impact of Western contact becomes even more evident. It was largely
through engagement with Western education, philosophy, theology, and scientific
thought that the Syro-Malabar community experienced remarkable growth and
transformation. Western missionary institutions, seminaries, and universities
played a crucial role in shaping a well-educated clergy and laity. The zeal for
evangelization, social reform, and institutional development was significantly
strengthened through this encounter with Western culture.
One may
even say that the bud of faith, though deeply rooted in ancient soil, remained
relatively undeveloped until it was permeated by Western theology and
philosophy. The encounter with scholastic theology, modern biblical studies,
and contemporary philosophical thought enabled the Syro-Malabar Church to
articulate its faith more confidently and engage meaningfully with the modern
world.
The
transformation in the educational level of Syro-Malabar Catholics is truly
remarkable. Many faithful were given opportunities to study in prestigious
universities in Europe and the United States, broadening their
intellectual horizons and enhancing their social mobility. This exposure not
only enriched them personally but also contributed to the economic prosperity
and social standing of the community. The clergy, too, benefited immensely from
higher studies in Rome and other renowned Catholic universities, which equipped
them with theological depth and global ecclesial awareness.
Among all
Oriental Catholic Churches, the Syro-Malabar Church stands out today for its
high level of education and scientific orientation. Proficiency in English,
engagement with modern technology, and adaptability to global contexts have
enabled members of the community to excel in various professional fields.
Thousands of doctors, nurses, engineers, educators, and professionals from the
Syro-Malabar community serve across the world, bearing witness not only to
their faith but also to their competence and dedication. One may rightly ask:
which other Oriental Catholic communities from regions such as Syria or Iraq
have been able to prosper in this way, given their historical and political
constraints?
This
reality does not diminish the value of Oriental identity but rather shows how
fruitful the integration of Western cultural and intellectual elements has been
for the Syro-Malabar Church. To reject these benefits in the name of cultural
or liturgical purity would be neither wise nor faithful to the Church’s lived
history.
What is
ultimately needed, therefore, is flexibility and openness—a willingness
to embrace the richness of the Oriental liturgical heritage while also
preserving and valuing the genuine benefits received from Western culture.
Authentic identity does not emerge from exclusion but from integration. The
Syro-Malabar Church need not choose between being Oriental or Western-oriented;
instead, it is called to be faithfully Oriental in its roots, creatively Indian
in its cultural expression, and responsibly open to the global Church.
Such a
balanced approach alone can ensure that the Church remains both deeply
traditional and dynamically relevant—a living tradition that continues to
breathe, grow, and give life to future generations.

